د. دنحا طوبيا كوركيس
20/10/2007, 12:12 AM
الزملاء الأفاضل.
وصلني هذا الخبر توا. يرجى التفاعل مع ما ورد فيه باعتباره أحد أهم المراجع اللغوية التي لا غنى عنها.
مودتي.
د. دنحا
Dear LINGUIST readers,
We would like to announce a new free reference resource for linguists:
Glottopedia, the free encyclopedia of linguistics (see
http://www.glottopedia.org).
Glottopedia is a wiki site that depends on volunteer contributions,
like
Wikipedia. All linguists are invited to share their knowledge with
others
through this site.
Glottopedia differs from Wikipedia (or other general encyclopedias such
as
Citizendium) in that
(i) its content is much more specialized (e.g. you'll be able to find
articles on ''copy raising'', ''appositive relative clause'',
''subcomparative construction'', ''relabelling'', ''rich agreement'',
''loan translation'', ''adfix''), and
(ii) users must have an account to edit articles, and they must be
linguists with an academic background.
Moreover, Glottopedia focuses on *dictionary articles* rather than
survey
articles of the sort that are found in Wikipedia (and various
specialized
linguistics handbooks). But each dictionary article (potentially)
provides
more information than just a definition: It also gives examples,
synonyms,
other meanings of the term, the origin of the term, some key
references,
and a translation into other languages (Glottopedia is a multilingual
enterprise; so far there are mainly articles in English and German).
Glottopedia also has articles on linguists, but unlike Wikipedia, which
aims to restrict its articles to ''notable people'' (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability (academics)),
Glottopedia
potentially has articles on all linguists. Thus, there is no danger
that an
administrator will delete your article because it does not meet this
(extremely vague) criterion. (However, Glottopedia's articles on living
linguists are restricted to links, in order to avoid problems of
personality rights.)
Eventually we also want to add articles about all languages and
language
families (with detailed references), and articles about things that we
need
for our everyday work (such as journals, conferences, institutions),
but at
the moment this is mainly an idea for the future.
We feel that Glottopedia is a resource that the field of linguistics
really
needs, and we hope that you will all contribute to it (as well as
contributing to Wikipedia, for a general audience!). Some of us have
taught
courses in which the assignment to the students was writing dictionary
articles on some technical terms. We think that especially advanced
students, who do not yet have easy access to other forms of
publications,
will find that Glottopedia gives them a great chance to make a
contribution
to the field.
Martin Haspelmath, Sven Naumann, and Götz Burger
Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics
-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-18-3057
وصلني هذا الخبر توا. يرجى التفاعل مع ما ورد فيه باعتباره أحد أهم المراجع اللغوية التي لا غنى عنها.
مودتي.
د. دنحا
Dear LINGUIST readers,
We would like to announce a new free reference resource for linguists:
Glottopedia, the free encyclopedia of linguistics (see
http://www.glottopedia.org).
Glottopedia is a wiki site that depends on volunteer contributions,
like
Wikipedia. All linguists are invited to share their knowledge with
others
through this site.
Glottopedia differs from Wikipedia (or other general encyclopedias such
as
Citizendium) in that
(i) its content is much more specialized (e.g. you'll be able to find
articles on ''copy raising'', ''appositive relative clause'',
''subcomparative construction'', ''relabelling'', ''rich agreement'',
''loan translation'', ''adfix''), and
(ii) users must have an account to edit articles, and they must be
linguists with an academic background.
Moreover, Glottopedia focuses on *dictionary articles* rather than
survey
articles of the sort that are found in Wikipedia (and various
specialized
linguistics handbooks). But each dictionary article (potentially)
provides
more information than just a definition: It also gives examples,
synonyms,
other meanings of the term, the origin of the term, some key
references,
and a translation into other languages (Glottopedia is a multilingual
enterprise; so far there are mainly articles in English and German).
Glottopedia also has articles on linguists, but unlike Wikipedia, which
aims to restrict its articles to ''notable people'' (see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability (academics)),
Glottopedia
potentially has articles on all linguists. Thus, there is no danger
that an
administrator will delete your article because it does not meet this
(extremely vague) criterion. (However, Glottopedia's articles on living
linguists are restricted to links, in order to avoid problems of
personality rights.)
Eventually we also want to add articles about all languages and
language
families (with detailed references), and articles about things that we
need
for our everyday work (such as journals, conferences, institutions),
but at
the moment this is mainly an idea for the future.
We feel that Glottopedia is a resource that the field of linguistics
really
needs, and we hope that you will all contribute to it (as well as
contributing to Wikipedia, for a general audience!). Some of us have
taught
courses in which the assignment to the students was writing dictionary
articles on some technical terms. We think that especially advanced
students, who do not yet have easy access to other forms of
publications,
will find that Glottopedia gives them a great chance to make a
contribution
to the field.
Martin Haspelmath, Sven Naumann, and Götz Burger
Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics
-----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-18-3057